(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-12 08:23 am (UTC)
i am biast against sgu but you mad some great points
the biggest part for me is that the characters
are just not likable at all

and the writers that are writing sgu are quit famous for writing plots with holes so big you could drive a truck through them

some interesting articles

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941270...2&cs=1&nid=2562

QUOTE
It all makes for an intriguing setup that doesn't quite gel, even by the end of the third episode. Sure, "SGU" is grittier, darker and psychologically deeper than previous versions. But so far, it's also a lot less fun.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...rss_print/style

QUOTE
Two things strike me, beyond "Stargate Universe's" stiffened pace: the predictability of the action and the characters, and the apparent tolerance for borrowing that the sci-fi genre treats as a matter of course. Plagiarism is the notable rhetoric, down to how things look in space and what people out there ever say to one another. What, exactly, gives "Stargate Universe" the right to beam its heroes from ship to surface the way "Star Trek" does? Why, except for budget and/or lack of imagination, do the interiors of the enormous starcruiser here bring to mind the dank hallways of "Alien" and the neo-brutalism of George Lucas's "Star Wars," with LED-bulb gizmo decor from "Star Trek" and "Battlestar Galactica"?

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

twasadark: (Default)
twasadark

April 2021

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags