twasadark: (Default)
twasadark ([personal profile] twasadark) wrote2008-05-17 09:34 pm

Dire news for the CW ...

... it looks like if things don't pick up for the CW next year they may not be around after that.

Article

[identity profile] parisindy.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
thats not good news at all :(

[identity profile] twasadark.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
It is a little worrisome, huh? I could see another network picking up Supernatural, though. Like the SciFi channel.

[identity profile] parisindy.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
yeah but i don't get the sci fi channel in Canada

and sci fi is really famous for picking up shows and canceling them, but i hope the show can live to full fill Kripke's five year plan

[identity profile] sadiane.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
SciFi has done a remarkably nice job with SG-verse, considering the quality of most things make for the channel.

And SPN was just seeming to catch on. The CW has some advertising issues - I watch the commercials (both during and for the show), and realize that they have no idea who the hell is watching this show. They seem to think they are selling it to young men, "Buffy for Boys", but it seems to be mostly grabbing women 16-40 who like the gore and violence, but stay for the "family drama" without all the typical "family drama" trappings...

[identity profile] twasadark.livejournal.com 2008-05-18 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
Sci Fi has also done an exceptional job with Battlestar Galactica, although you are SO right about the quality of most of their stuff. I mean, Aztec Rex???? Puhleeese!!

Perhaps for us 16-40 year old women family drama = gore.

LOL!!

[identity profile] tru-faith-lost.livejournal.com 2008-05-19 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
True, but did you see what SciFi did to Sliders? Ugh. I'm not sure it'd do SN justice. Maybe if they do call it quits, they'll know in time to give Kripke and Co a heads up and they can fast forward?